翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Tutton ・ R v U (FJ) ・ R v Vaillancourt ・ R v Van der Peet ・ R v Verity-Amm ・ R v Victor ・ R v Viljoen ・ R v W (D) ・ R v Walker ・ R v Wallace ・ R v Wang ・ R v Wanhalla ・ R v Waterfield ・ R v Wells ・ R v Whitfield ・ R v Wholesale Travel Group Inc ・ R v Wigglesworth ・ R v Williams ・ R v Wong ・ R v Woodrow ・ R v Woollin ・ R v Wray ・ R v Zikalala ・ R v Zinn ・ R v Zundel ・ R v. Fellows; R v. Arnold ・ R Virginis ・ R Viswanathan ・ R W B Stephens Medal ・ R W Roden Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Wholesale Travel Group Inc ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Wholesale Travel Group Inc ''R v Wholesale Travel Group Inc'' () 3 S.C.R. 154, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada case on the distinction between "true crime" and regulatory offences. == Background == Wholesale Travel sold vacation packages which it advertised as being at "wholesale prices" when, in fact, they were not wholesale prices at all. The company was charged with five counts of false or misleading advertising contrary to s. 36(1)(a) (s. 60(2) ) of the ''Competition Act''.〔Stuart, Don. ("Canadian Criminal Law 11th Edition" ). Carswell Publishing, 2009, p.383.〕 The charge was a hybrid offence that could be either an indictment consisting of a fine at the discretion of the court and to imprisonment for five years or to both, or a summary conviction consisting of a fine of $25,000 and a prison term for one year or both.〔Stuart, Don. ("Canadian Criminal Law 11th Edition" ). Carswell Publishing, 2009, p.383.〕 At trial, the judge held that ss. 36 and 37.3, which allowed for a due diligence defence, were in violation of ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Crown's appeal for a dismissal was allowed and the case was resubmitted for trial. At appeal, the Court of Appeal for Ontario upheld the order for a trial. The accused applied to the Supreme Court of Canada and was rejected the first time but was accepted on a second appeal. The issue before the Court was whether s. 37.3(2) of the Competition Act violated s. 7 of the Charter (which safeguards the "security of the person"). 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Wholesale Travel Group Inc」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.